Two regulatory frameworks. Different origins. Different enforcement mechanisms. But for facility managers responsible for diesel storage tanks at hospitals and data centers, these requirements frequently intersect in ways that create both compliance obligations and operational opportunities.
Table of Contents
The Joint Commission focuses on healthcare facility accreditation and patient safety. The EPA's SPCC (Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure) program under 40 CFR Part 112 focuses on preventing oil discharges to navigable waters. Neither was designed with the other in mind, yet both end up governing the same fuel tanks at the same facilities.
Understanding where these frameworks overlap—and where they diverge—can help you build a unified compliance approach rather than maintaining parallel programs that duplicate effort without adding protection.
Important note: This article provides a high-level educational overview of regulatory frameworks. It is not legal advice. Regulations change, interpretations vary by jurisdiction, and your specific situation may involve factors not addressed here. Consult your compliance team, legal counsel, and the relevant regulatory bodies for guidance on your facility's specific obligations.
Joint Commission requirements apply to healthcare organizations seeking or maintaining accreditation. This includes hospitals, critical access hospitals, nursing care centers, behavioral health facilities, ambulatory care organizations, and home care organizations. The Joint Commission accredits nearly 21,000 healthcare organizations in the United States, making its standards the de facto requirement for most healthcare facility operations.
SPCC requirements apply to non-transportation facilities that store oil (including diesel fuel) and could reasonably be expected to discharge to navigable waters. The threshold is straightforward: if your facility has more than 1,320 gallons of aggregate aboveground oil storage capacity, or more than 42,000 gallons of completely buried storage capacity, you likely need an SPCC plan. For context, many hospital generator systems easily exceed 1,320 gallons, and hyperscale data centers may store tens of thousands of gallons.
The practical result: most hospitals fall under both frameworks. Data centers typically fall under SPCC (and increasingly under state-level generator regulations), though they're not subject to Joint Commission unless they house healthcare operations.
Joint Commission accreditation involves the Environment of Care (EC) standards that address emergency power systems. Two elements of performance are particularly relevant to fuel management:
EC.02.05.03 requires hospitals to maintain a reliable emergency power source. This includes inventorying emergency power system equipment, identifying areas where power loss could result in patient harm, and ensuring generator fuel is available and usable. That last phrase—"available and usable"—is where fuel quality enters the compliance picture. Fuel that's present but degraded doesn't satisfy the requirement.
EC.02.05.07 addresses inspection, testing, and maintenance documentation for emergency power systems. This includes monthly generator load testing (at least 30 minutes at minimum 30% of nameplate rating), automatic transfer switch testing, and the triennial 4-hour continuous run test for standby generators.
The Joint Commission also references NFPA 110, which requires annual fuel quality testing using appropriate ASTM standards. Combined with the Joint Commission's Emergency Management Standard requiring facilities to plan for 96-hour operational sustainability, the practical implication is clear: you need documented evidence that your stored fuel meets specifications and will perform when needed.
The SPCC rule takes a different approach—environmental protection rather than operational readiness—but ultimately requires many of the same practices.
If your facility exceeds the storage thresholds, you must develop and implement an SPCC plan that includes facility diagrams showing tank locations and capacities, secondary containment for the largest single container plus precipitation, overfill prevention procedures, inspection protocols, and countermeasures for containing and cleaning up spills.
Key SPCC requirements that affect fuel tank management include regular integrity testing of storage tanks, inspection of containment structures, documentation of inspections and maintenance activities, employee training on spill prevention and response, and periodic plan reviews and updates (at least every five years or when significant changes occur).
For facilities storing more than 10,000 gallons of oil in aggregate aboveground storage, the SPCC plan must be certified by a Professional Engineer. Smaller facilities may be eligible for self-certification under the Tier I or Tier II qualified facility provisions.
Despite their different origins, Joint Commission and SPCC requirements converge around several fuel management practices. Recognizing these overlaps lets you satisfy both frameworks with unified procedures rather than redundant programs.
Documentation and record-keeping matter to both frameworks. Joint Commission surveyors want to see evidence of testing, maintenance, and fuel quality verification. SPCC inspectors want to see inspection logs, training records, and evidence that your plan is being implemented. A well-designed fuel management program generates documentation that serves both purposes.
Tank inspection requirements exist in both frameworks, though with different emphases. SPCC focuses on structural integrity and leak prevention; Joint Commission focuses on operational readiness. Visual inspections that check for corrosion, leaks, structural damage, and proper venting address both concerns simultaneously.
Fuel quality monitoring serves environmental and operational goals. Degraded fuel is more likely to cause spills or equipment failures (SPCC concern) and is also less likely to support reliable generator operation (Joint Commission concern). Annual ASTM testing and regular microbial monitoring generate data relevant to both frameworks.
Secondary containment is explicitly required by SPCC and implicitly supports Joint Commission goals. Containment that prevents environmental releases also prevents loss of fuel inventory that could compromise emergency power duration.
Training requirements appear in both frameworks. SPCC requires personnel to understand spill prevention and response procedures; the Joint Commission requires personnel to understand emergency power system operation. Cross-training programs can address both requirements efficiently.
Not every requirement overlaps. Understanding the differences helps you ensure you're not missing obligations unique to one framework.
The SPCC rule includes specific provisions for transfer operations, requiring procedures and secondary containment for areas where fuel is moved into or out of storage. It also includes reporting requirements for certain discharge events (more than 42 gallons in each of two discharges to navigable waters within twelve months, or a single discharge of more than 1,000 gallons).
The Joint Commission's 96-hour sustainability planning requirement goes beyond what SPCC addresses. Joint Commission also requires specific generator testing frequencies and load requirements that have no SPCC parallel.
Data centers face a somewhat different regulatory landscape. They're not typically subject to Joint Commission (unless housing healthcare operations), but they face SPCC requirements if they exceed storage thresholds—which most do.
Data centers also face increasing state-level regulation of backup generator operations. Recent developments in Texas (Senate Bill 6) and Virginia (DEQ guidance on expanded emergency generator use) illustrate the evolving regulatory environment for large power users. Air quality permits, emergency planning requirements under EPCRA (including Tier II reporting for facilities with large fuel storage), and noise regulations add additional compliance layers.
For data center operators, fuel quality management serves both compliance and operational objectives. The 99.999% uptime standard that defines data center reliability depends on backup generators that start instantly and run indefinitely when called upon. Degraded fuel undermines that reliability regardless of how well you've documented your SPCC plan.
Rather than maintaining separate programs for different regulatory frameworks, consider building a fuel management program that satisfies multiple requirements simultaneously.
Consolidated testing schedule: Annual ASTM specification testing satisfies both NFPA 110 (referenced by Joint Commission) and demonstrates the kind of proactive tank management that SPCC inspectors appreciate. Quarterly microbial monitoring fills gaps between annual tests and generates trending data useful for both operational planning and compliance documentation.
Integrated inspection protocols: Develop inspection checklists that address tank structural integrity (SPCC focus), fuel quality indicators (Joint Commission focus), containment system condition (SPCC), and safety equipment functionality (both). One inspection, one checklist, documentation that serves multiple purposes.
Unified record-keeping: Maintain fuel quality test results, treatment logs, inspection records, and training documentation in a single system accessible to both Joint Commission surveyors and SPCC inspectors. This reduces the risk of gaps or inconsistencies that could create compliance issues.
Cross-functional training: Train personnel on both operational procedures (generator testing, fuel sampling) and environmental procedures (spill response, containment inspection). Integrate the training rather than conducting separate sessions for each regulatory framework.
One practical benefit of rigorous fuel management is the documentation trail it creates. When inspectors or surveyors arrive, you can demonstrate ongoing attention to fuel quality rather than scrambling to prove compliance.
Effective compliance documentation includes dated fuel test results with laboratory reports, treatment application logs showing products used and when, inspection records with findings and corrective actions, training records showing personnel completion dates, and trend analysis showing fuel condition over time.
For healthcare facilities subject to Joint Commission survey, this documentation demonstrates that "available and usable" fuel isn't just a claim—it's a documented fact. For facilities subject to SPCC, it demonstrates that your plan isn't just paper; it's an active program that prevents the conditions leading to spills.
This overview addresses general principles, but regulatory compliance ultimately depends on specific circumstances. Consult qualified specialists when you're unsure whether your facility meets SPCC thresholds, when designing or modifying fuel storage systems, when responding to regulatory inspections or enforcement actions, when significant changes occur (new tanks, facility expansion, ownership changes), or when regulations change at federal, state, or local levels.
Your compliance team, legal counsel, environmental consultants, and fuel management partners each bring different expertise to the table. The goal is to ensure nothing falls through the cracks between different specialists' areas of responsibility.
Need help navigating fuel compliance for your facility? Bell Performance works with hospitals, data centers, and other facilities to implement fuel management programs that satisfy multiple regulatory requirements. Our Mission Critical test slates provide the ASTM documentation Joint Commission surveyors expect, while our treatment and monitoring programs support the proactive management that SPCC compliance requires. Contact Bell Performance at 407-831-5021 to discuss your facility's specific situation.
| Aspect | Joint Commission | SPCC (40 CFR 112) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Healthcare facility accreditation, patient safety | Environmental protection, spill prevention |
| Applies to | Healthcare organizations seeking accreditation | Facilities with >1,320 gal aboveground or >42,000 gal buried oil storage |
| Fuel quality testing | Required annually per NFPA 110 reference | Not explicitly required, but supports plan implementation |
| Generator testing | Monthly load tests, triennial extended run | Not addressed |
| Secondary containment | Not explicitly required | Required for bulk storage |
| Documentation | Required for accreditation surveys | Required and must be maintained at the facility |
| Plan certification | N/A | PE certification required for >10,000 gal aggregate storage |
| Enforcement | Loss of accreditation | EPA enforcement, civil penalties |